Assessment within NVQs/RQF/QCF is ongoing with the student/candidate fully participating in the assessment process, e.g., through assessment planning and reviews of performance.
If this participation is taken seriously, then it must be accepted that there will be times when the students / candidates and assessors’ perceptions, of whether agreed evidence (agreed during assessment planning/review stages) meets the standards, are going to be different.
If this occurs, the student/candidate should have the right to appeal via an accessible and open system.
The characteristics of our appeals structure related to NVQs/RQF/QCF will include:
Response times to appeals will be measured in days rather than in months or years and not be so bureaucratic as effectively to nullify the purpose of having such a system.
Where a student/candidate disagrees with the assessment given, he/she must explain the reasons for this with the assessor concerned, as soon as possible. In the circumstances this will be immediately after receiving the assessment decision.
The lecture / assessor must consider the student / candidate’s explanation explanation and provide an immediate response through:
The lecturer/assessor concerned must forward the original assessment record and student/candidate’s
evidence and the student/candidate appeal form (section I complete) to the internal verifier.
The Internal Verifier must review the assessment decision. This will normally involve an evaluation of:
In doing so the internal verifier must complete Section 2 of the Student/Candidate Appeal Form and provide the candidate with the reconsidered decision within 5 working days of receiving the appeal.
If the candidate disagrees with the decision, the internal verifier must inform the external verifier that there is an unresolved appeal. The external verifier will review the evidence from Stage 1 and Stage 2 and provide the student/candidate the reviewed decision within 5 working days.
Where the candidate remains unhappy with the reconsidered assessment decisions, appeal must proceed to Stage 3.
Where candidates remain unhappy with the decision made at Stage 2, they will have the right to forward
their case to the External Verifier. The Internal Verifier concerned at stage 2 must forward relevant
details to the relevant awarding body external verifier. These should include:
Records of all appeals are to be logged and made available as appropriate to:
The following documents should be attached to this procedure:
CCL will seek to assess of its impact of its policies on staff/candidates to ensure that real improvements are being made in tackling discrimination and promoting diversity.